Видео

To bad yoga doesn't increase the IQ of a person. This animated blue guy definitly needs it.😅

This example he uses about the cosmological argument presents a straw man. That is not what the cosmological argument is. The cosmological argument is: 1) Anything that begins to exist has a cause 2) the universe began to exist 3) Therefore the universe has a cause Now, one can argue that the premises are wrong, but the conclusion follows the premises and this isn’t special pleading. There is no exception here. Christians hold that God did not “begin” to exist so God does not need a cause. The argument he presented is ironically, a fallacy itself, a straw man fallacy.

Marty looks the same a decade later

i've faced da same problem. i'm not use to dis accent and i'm struggling

The Kalam Cosmological argument is terrible, and yet it's among the best arguments for god. Let that little chestnut suffuse through your spiritual being.

How, Who, What, When, Where, Why. Each of those words has a 'W' in it. Each has an 'H' in it. That's GOT to be significant somehow. What are they secretly trying to tell us, that only I can grasp ??

This isn't even wrong in a science way, it's wrong in an English way.

"Get that through your head, Jordan." It did. It went right through

A quick point, airplanes don't list MPG, because it is pretty meaningless. Instead they use GPH (gallons per hr). This is because a number of factors come into play, including wind speed and direction. But even in still air, altitude, air temp etc. will effect airspeed. Example: a PA-28_161( Piper Cherokee) at 75% power (8.5 GPH) flying at 5000 ft at 40F air temp has a true air speed of ~110 kts, while at 8000 ft, 50F, it has an air speed of 115 kts. So the plane flying at 8000 ft will have a longer range. And as far as induction goes, there is a good reason why it doesn't provide "free" energy. The instant a coil moves through a magnetic field and that field induces a current in it, the coil becomes an electromagnet with its own field, and the polarity of the field will be such that its interaction with the external field opposes the motion of the coil. The faster the coil moves, the greater the current and the stronger the opposing force. This is why, if one hooks up a hand crank generator to a light and starts cranking it, intially the light glows dimly, and as you crank faster, the light glows brighter. But, as you try to crank faster, and faster, the generator get harder and harder to turn. It "fights back" more and more.

Awesome, another Terrence Howard. Just what we needed.

My degree is in stage art and has nothing to do with physics. But at the theatre academy they told us something that feels fitting in this context. “It is ok to break the rules. But you have to know the rules before you break them”

Is space-time fluid?

When I was first reading (and watching documentaries, series, RUclips videos...) about QM, I was rather concerned that the concept of the tiny size of the subatomic particles _didn't_ freak me out. There were famous physicists saying that they couldn't imagine it, that trying to picture it screwed with their minds, but I could. Initially I thought it might have something to do with my synaesthesia. I "see" what I hear, usually music but not always, so I guessed that my "third eye" (it's how I describe where I "see" sounds) was making it up to "help". Whereas I cannot prove that to be untrue, I eventually realised that I just didn't understand enough to _be_ freaked out! Sometimes you just need to realise what you truly understand and what you don't. General rule of thumb - if you think you understand something declared to be difficult without such difficulty, you're either a greater than Einstein genius, or you completely missed the point. Chances are, it's the latter.

Instead of using magnetic induction from the Earth's magnetic field travelling west to east, you could just use a Ram Air Turbine to generate electricity when flying in any direction. Same logic as people thinking you can charge an electric car by putting a wind turbine on it

I want to ask these people if they can solve ANY problem in a Physics Textbook, that involves a bit of calculus. Or I just won't take them serious.

if the fluid had 0 viscosity i think orbits world work.

Why diid I know the sponsor for this video would be Brilliant?

Joe Rogan: you just blew my mind.

Did he… Yeah. He did. He re-invented the luminiferous æther theory.

Is he trying to prove the aether?

@2:17 I am the person described here, except, I am painfully aware of how little I know, and how much there is that I don't know. And the ass of it is, I do _not know_ how to go about rectifying this. About 18 months-2 years ago, I accidentally epiphan..ied my way into suddenly "understanding" a simplistic but, I worry, unfalsifiable (I'm too ignorant to know how to falsify it), conceptual framework for the universe, that for me made "sense" of the following: The 'beginning' of the universe The 'heat death' of the universe The continuous expansion of the universe Why we can't accelerate things beyond a certain point Why an accelerated thing would necessarily gain mass Time dilation being a thing Decay existing Black holes dissipating ostensibly via radiation And, in my attempts to undo the effects that this epiphany had upon my "understanding" of the universe, I tried to come up with some "prediction" of something that I believe should occur within this 'framework', and fully anticipated I'd discover something that would break it, allowing me to get on with enjoying popular lay people science shows and armchair philosophy, like I used to. I failed. I discovered the 'thing' I tried to test my simplistic stupidity with, is a thing, it has a name, zero-point energy. I was specifically hoping to find that my idea about what I would expect to find at the extremes of the small / cold of known reality were face palmingly backwards. Apparently not. And I genuinely don't know how to proceed. I have no higher education, I'm not remotely capable with maths, and I am very aware that I could easily end up confirmation biasing my ass into believing I'm a god damned genius, start up my own RUclips channel, and confidently spew my wooey, horse crap "science" explanation for all of reality, a fate I wish to avoid. In all seriousness though, I have been genuinely distressed by this. I don't even know what questions I could ask to allow me fix it. Well, I have two questions but I don't think they can help, I don't know enough to understand why the answers make sense. Why is it even a question that the expansion of the universe is a thing? I honestly do not understand why this isn't what is expected, or why anyone would expect anything different. Why is "gravity" a question, or problem quantum physics is trying to solve? I don't understand how those two things are connected, or why they're supposed to be connected. It's like my brain translates this as something like the idea of trying to figure out the nature of oxygen, or hydrogen atoms, using 'monsoon theory', based on how well the behavior of water in the atmosphere, relating to weather patterns, is understood. Like, yeah . But no. It doesn't apply to individual oxygen atoms. And I can't seem to find appropriately dumbed down explanations. If you've read this far, I'm sorry about your lack of interesting things to experience in life... If anyone knows of a way I can fix my brain, that isn't simply suggesting I learn all of maths and physics... I literally am not capable, try as I do, and I do try, you would legitimately be helping a fellow human in genuine distress.

At least he's not a flat earther.

there is no god. what you think was a church was roman empire by carrot rather than stick and even that was just a judean fucking coup de tat. so fuck your bullshit "god" and all that fucking sand dancing bullshit JUPITER IS OPTIMUS MAXIMUS AND JEHOVAH IS A CUNT

This makes me sad. If he had been given opportunity he might be one of the worlds great researcher. He seems motivated.

@16:40, you really wanted to say "Dumb it down" but managed to hold it in in case anyone thought you were insulting them. 😂

11:52 _"You are NOT prepared!"_

19:40 That mass is a measure of how much matter is there does _not_ come from modern textbooks, Newton himself already defined mass in that way, more than 300 years ago! So Mr. Thornhill does not only reject science since 1900, but essentially science since 1700. :D

Please martymer, a law of attraction roast. These people are absolute dingbats. It’ll make a good video

Comically enough when educated people start talking in Math the information turns into a string of spells written in Old. I say this as somebody who seeks expanded knowledge, not every field can be understood to high degree which explains all the Specialization that comes with higher education. Also, is that not just fluid dynamics the guy is trying to explore? Is that not already well worked field of study for all things flying/floating/swimming?

At least he's starting with some small😂😂 Oh wait

The problem with many autodidacts IMO is that they tend to have very little or no idea about the things they might NOT know. Not that they can't be very good at whatever it is they do. But yea this poor dude is way atop Mt. Stupid & a prime Dunning-Kruger exemplar. & not to nitpick but, my understanding is that the credential of expertise in a field is typically a Masters whereas a PhD indicates an expert who has already contributed something additional(however trivial or significant) to siad field.

there is no problem with time dilation (kinematic or gravitational), inertia, and the 3rd thing he said. I read posts all the time "we don't know anything about gravity"...BS we know tons...the theory predicted time dilation (observed), non-static universe (observed), black-holes (observed), Shapiro delay (curved spaced, observed), The geodetic effect (it takes less than 360 degrees to go completely around a mass, observed), Lens-Thirring Effect (aka frame dragging--indirectly observed, direct observation is done, but noisy), and ofc gravitational radiation (2 Nobels, one for indirect, one for direct observation). Regarding quantum gravity--that really is the domain of experts, and is ofc an open problem and will be an open problem for some time, and its not getting solved on RUclips. BTW: special relativity is reconciled with quantum mechanics, and led to the greatest agreement btw theory and experiment in the history of Mankind (electron g-2).

>dude, ive figured out quantum mechanics! >pushes a thermos through goo >looks at u like it clarifies everything

The Dunning Kruger Effect is basically pseudoscience and science advocates shouldn't be promoting it. Especially the popular interpretation as opposed to the paper. Firstly the whole "mount stupid" and "valley of despair" curve that you flashed up wasn't even in the paper and it's a pure pop culture invention. There are two straight lines in the actual paper. One is an x=y tracking skill and the other is a line representing self-appraised skill that intersects in the middle with a lower slope; x=y*2 -1 sort of thing. The authors concluded this showed the unskilled being relatively more confident than the skilled. That's a fundamenrtally unsound conclusion. It's just regression to the mean. Unless people are perfect at estimating their skill then you're always going to get two lines like that even when there's nothing of substance to observe. There was correlation between skill and self-appraised skill but, as you'd expect, those with lower skill tended to over estimate and those with higher underestimate. This is unsound because those with 0% skill can only overestimate and those with 100% skill can only underestimate; so you will always these this characteristic distribution when measuring something of this sort; regression to the mean.

Honestly, when I listen to some debunking videos it’s humbling to understand how little I do know, despite not worst of educations. And it’s sad that people who knows less than me try to pretend like they know more than professionals or experts.

This is why local free public libraries are vital.

I wounder what his hightest formal education is. It kind out sounds like he has the level of understanding. that he thinks he understand it. But not enough to understan why it don´t work the way he think it should.

"poverty porn" it is not good entertainment. "ignorance porn"? flatearthers cannot explain south and north starts all this observations based on concave earth. Nobody wants debunk concave earth because it is to obvious. GPS works on ground based sub stations network, it textbooks triangulation in school and university no satellites needed, do you read this books or you also apply Dunning-Kruger effect to me. I have read bad books. Sun is liquid and standard model of particles have flaws but everyday are published peer-reviews articles about that. Even fact stays that Sun is liquid, "paper-mill" never stop. Exist brave people we put labels on them "ignorant", "attention seeking who :)" etc. People will die but truth seeking spirit will be alive until Earth is alive.

To be fair, most people wouldn't benefit from advanced science education. Also, there are "lay scientists" and "lay engineers" that are brilliant. But for every brilliant one, there are many more like the man in the video.

At around the 7 minute mark I'd have to say, no. I do not understand anything you just said. I believe you do. But, sadly, anything more than a + or - in my equations and I leave it to those that know. ha ha

"West peak ..." Gonna steal that term, and use it without explanation whenever anyone says a stupid.

"This video is no available anymore"

The author of the mentioned book, "A saucerful of science", apparently also is not a real physicist - he describes himself as an "independent researcher", apparently is not employed at any university, and I can't find anything about his actual education. So that he mentioned someone in his book is not a good recommendation at all. :D

Fluidic space? That's where species 8472 comes from!

I am blaming social media for making itso easy for anyone to have a platform and think they can add to our collective knowledge. Only a couple of decades ago, you would never know about people like these, they would be able to get an adience and quickly give up.

west peak of mount dunning-kruger ok, i am so going to steal that, that's amazing

"You may have learned about this fact and this fact and you have developed a model that fits those three, but what about all those facts over here?" That's the same issue the flat earth community has. They don't seem to try and figure out how their model would actually work; instead they just focus on objections and work out models that "defuse" those particular objections. As a result, they have 30 different partial models, each addressing a different objection, but those all don't work together as a coherent whole that covers all the facts at the same time.

Always misunderstanding Newton's Third Law and they never recognise their misunderstanding doesn't actually match reality, or if they do recognise it is because Newton was wrong not that they misunderstand him.

For me it is less the accent, and more the recording environment. 3 times to figure out what he was saying. Edit: You get about 0.01% of mass from Higgs Field. The rest is good old E=mc^2. Also, he may mean spacetime rather than outer space, but he's still wrong in all the ways that matter. (If space went "around" objects, i don't even -where do those objects exist and how do they occupy volume?) My first suggestion to him would be: Don't measure things with your eyeballs. Do not move you thing in fluid using your arm, which is inconsistent in so many ways.

I hope this guy will accept that he was ignorant & wrong, unlike virtually every flat-Earther I correct on basic factual inaccuracy...